Life without Google
I had an interesting discussion with Josh Fraser tonight during which a frightening proposition came up: how would your life be impacted if Google went away tomorrow? Now before you blow me off and say “I’d just use Yahoo!”, I’d like to encourage you to think about it in the broader sense of: what if we didn’t have a nice search interface to the internet?
It’s hard for me to imagine such a world, but it would definitely impact my life. I use Google dozens of times a day to look up functions, answer questions, and even spellcheck words I’m not sure about. It allows me to not have to keep reference books at my desk or keep a long list of bookmarks of sites with helpful tables of code. I even use Google as my calculator occasionally.
Often many people of the generation before me look at my generation’s dependence on the internet at large (and Google in particular) as a sign of the diminishing intellect among our youth. I couldn’t disagree with this notion more, however. The internet is a tool that frees our brains from having to memorize mindless trivia, remember hundreds of rarely used functions, and provides a seamless interface to a huge pool of knowledge. This allows us to become even more specialized in our thinking and spend more of our brain cycles solving problems as opposed to memorizing data or doing research. Not to say that we don’t still do research, but the process has just been immensely simplified.
I think of the internet as a tool…a base of knowledge “in the cloud” that is at my fingertips and frees my mind from having to remember some of the more rarely used bits that people of previous generations might’ve kept in their heads. Does this make us stupider? I think not, but I’m sure there are those out there that will disagree. The question still remains, though, how has the internet’s depth of knowledge and simplistic search interface impacted your life? And how would it impact it if it were suddenly gone?
I have actually been hearing this argument come up more and more in discussions about the today's "google" generation. I see both sides of the argument that Google is making people lazier, but I see the other side that with out Google people may not have the vast knowledge they have. I would have to side the latter. Yes, Google can be a tool of laziness, but more so than not I believe it is a tool of knowledge expansion. The ability to find things in .0018 seconds is priceless. Google has done more than create a search engine, it has created the expansion of resources to depths we have never seen before.
"Does this make us stupider? " – apparently you still need a dictionary on your desk!
What I see has nothing to do with memorization of trivia, and more to do with attention span and the ability to think deeply. I increasingly see young people not being able or at least being unwilling to spend an hour thinking through something complicated, ie "if the answer is not on Google then it is not worth knowing."
Present company excepted.
Probably missing the obvious here, but I'm not sure I follow the reference.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stupider
I think the point of attention is a good discussion; but removing the question of what the cause of the shorter attention span is, it almost makes the searchable web all the more important. It's the only way someone with a short attention span is going to find the answers they're looking for.
I suppose too, that we, our generation that is, are more likely to look up new, "huh," kind of information since we can find it so quickly. Why would we waste valuable time searching through countless reference books or encyclopedias to find one quick fact. Google opens the door for us to find the answers quickly, retain the information if it is of value, and look further into it if it is of true interest. Thus, this allows us to think deeply about things we are really interested in, no matter the length of the attention span.
I can't imagine a life without Google